Dibble Dobbles

Will Buckley (whoever he is) writes an article aimed at being humourous in the Guardian newspaper. While explaining how Australia crumbled at Perth he writes:

The extent of the crisis they were facing was evident when the first sentence I heard on Thursday morning was 'and that's RP Singh's fourth wicket'. The Australians had crumbled. Confused by dibble-dobble seamers who were neither one thing nor the other."

Another case of an inept writer making statements on a game he barely understands. I find it astounding how, because of the increasing thirst to lap up anything cricket these days, any idiot can access print space to spew rubbish; to see this in the Guardian is doubly surprising. RP Singh's away swingers at 140 + kmph and Ishant Sharma's spell to Ponting are dibble dobbles? Obviously little Willy's never held a bat and have to face up to a new ball.

One ball Willy...why don't you pad up and play one ball from RP and you'll know how dibble dobble it really is. Maybe the standard of English cricket has allowed writers there to forget what the game is really like. Very understandable.